|

This one’s for John Stokes because, despite my being burned
out from exhaustion and buried in the hail, he trusted me. And he
appreciates better than most that true love can make a blade of
grass stand up straight and tall. Even if I do sometimes wonder
what’s going on in the mind of Miss X.
At the beginning of October last year, I achieved Principal Social
Worker status. Along with the terrifying prospect of responsibility
came a new job. Along with the new job came the terrifying prospect
of responsibility (it was, I believe, Harry Secombe who feared that
one day someone would approach, thank Secombe for all he had done,
congratulate him for all he had achieved, and then ask for it all
back). My current terms of employment require me to develop a
service for the ‘dually diagnosed’ client, a task that, due to the
myriad definitions of ‘dual diagnosis’, seems for the most part to
be akin to controlling the weather (prior to working with
individuals who experience both enduring mental ill health, usually
psychotic in nature, and problematic use of pharmaceuticals, usually
‘illicit’, I was responsible for providing appropriate
rehabilitation for dependent opiate and alcohol users). There is
also an expectation that I pass on my experience by offering
supervision to colleagues. Surprisingly, the Local Authority acted
with alarming haste to fill my vacant post. Recently, following
agreement with the local Drug and Alcohol Service, I met the
incumbent. Before discussing the intricacies of assessing
motivation, the parlous state of finances (the Local Authority’s,
not mine), and the difficulties associated with crack cocaine
production, he offered the following: “I have over 500 Bob Dylan
bootlegs”. So, by a twist of fate that is anything but simple, Dylan
is now championed within (discounting my own area of expertise) the
Youth Offending, Criminal Justice, and Drug and Alcohol Teams.
Events lead me to believe that, in the world of Psychology,
champions are a little thinner on the ground.
You may recall some time ago I suggested ‘The Psychosis of Dreams’
by Peter Higginson (first published in Isis #88 and later reprinted
in the Anthology) was worth reading. I still hold that to be true.
However, over time and with repeated readings, the content of the
article has occupied my thoughts and the reason for its worth has
altered. So much so I decided to seek the learned opinions of
others.
Whilst attending a conference in the North of England, I happened
upon an Honorary Consultant Clinical Psychologist with a stated
interest in the models of psychosis. Bingo, I thought (I didn’t
shout it though as it didn’t seem appropriate). Dr Gillian Haddock
is currently Reader in Clinical Psychology at the University of
Manchester, added to which she has BSc (hons), M.Clin. Psychol, and
PhD after her name. A quick visit to the Academic Division of
Clinical Psychology website reveals that Dr Haddock is currently
involved in nine research projects (none of which feature Dylan but
in fairness he hasn’t written a song about her). During lunch I
asked if she would be kind enough to give her professional opinion
regarding Higginson’s theory. I should have paid closer attention to
the glazed look. With hindsight, I suspect she felt sorry for me;
either that or the security guards were busy elsewhere. The
intervening months have been marked only by their silence. Far from
defeated I approached the task from the other end of the spectrum.
Accosting a Consultant Psychiatrist and mentioning ‘psychosis’,
‘occupied thoughts’, and ‘Bob Dylan’ may not be the wisest decision
I have ever made but on this occasion it proved to be opportune. Dr
John Burke, country music aficionado and acquaintance of John Prine,
was more than happy to offer his thoughts. He failed to inform me
that this would take some time. As I write I am still waiting (in
truth, I forgive John as it was he who, when spying my Nashville
Skyline badge, came over all misty eyed and quietly mumbled “Ah,
Bob”. More recently, he addressed me as Mr Tambourine Man). The
reality, therefore, is that I have a choice. I can argue,
unsupported by eminence, that Higginson’s simplistic notion of
mental ill health is at best poorly researched, “I believe that
Dylan suffers from a contained form…..of schizophrenia, where the
agony of a broken heart is threatened all the time by manifestations
of psychotic pain”, or at worst, appallingly hackneyed, “it’s clear
that the pressures of celebrity, nay myth, that this man experiences
are so diabolical that they can drive him mad”. Or, I can make no
comment whatsoever. Just like the good Doctors.
Dylan Country
Writing for Freewheelin can, at times, be a frustrating experience.
Articles, or more precisely themes, appear at the most unexpected
moments. More often than not they are followed by the realisation
that someone, somewhere, has been there before. Whilst researching
an article exploring Dylan’s debt to country music it became
apparent that I wouldn’t be able to add anything new. Brian Hinton
(‘Country Roads – How Country Came To Nashville’) affords Dylan more
coverage than many of the more established country performers,
whilst Peter Doggett (‘Are You Ready For The Country’) begins his
history of the roots of country rock with a chapter dedicated to
Dylan. Therefore, rather than reproduce the words of those so far
mentioned, I would suggest that each book is read in its entirety.
But don’t stop there. Colin Escott (‘The Story of Country Music’) is
thorough in his examination of the genre and Bill C. Malone
(‘Country Music USA’) provides an extremely compelling study (it
goes without saying that both authors cite Dylan’s influence). For
those of you without the stomach I recommend Patrick Humphries and
the late John Bauldie who, between them, provide more than adequate
background information (‘Oh No! Not another Bob Dylan Book’).
However, choosing the easy way will leave you educationally
impoverished. Dolly Parton’s reasons for wearing her hair in a
certain style will remain a mystery (“the taller the hair, the
nearer to God”). Furthermore, should you be one of the many who fail
to take her seriously, Colin Escott argues that you ought to revise
your opinion: “Royalties from just one of her songs, ‘I Will Always
Love You’, exceed the gross domestic product of smaller countries”.
The sharp eyed amongst you will have no doubt spotted the potential
for yet another unfavourable joke about Dolly’s breasts. I just
can’t bring myself to include it as she already has her fair share
of knockers.
By the same token, Hank Williams may be nothing more to you than a
passing influence on the young Dylan. You would, of course, be
barking up the wrong tree, or in the words of Hank, ‘wearin’ out
your walking shoes’ (in either instance, your educational
impoverishment will be replaced by spiritual bankruptcy). According
to Sid Griffin, whose thoughts accompany ‘Come September’, Hank
Williams “is the prototype, what you might call the experimental
model for so many things; a live fast, die young figure before James
Dean defined the role, a pioneering musician and songwriter who
defined his genre as his art superseded it and a Southern gentlemen
trapped inside a body which simply could not withstand the demands
nature and its owner placed on it”. Dylan’s admiration for Williams
is well documented. Indeed, it is worth remembering that, when it
came to source material, the young Dylan maintained a purists
attitude. He spurned the commercialism of Tin Pan Alley in favour of
performers whose music came from the heart (Williams’ songs were
desperately real when he sang them. As Escott notes “beneath them
lay the same haunted spirituality that underpins much of the Stanley
Brother’s or Bill Monroe’s work”). Hank Williams was, without doubt,
a major source of inspiration. Dylan himself recalled singing “ his
songs way back, even before I was playing rock and roll as a
teenager”.
Stephen Walsh’s account of Williams’ last day alive makes for
fascinating reading, revealing as it does, death as a real life
‘Cheating Heart’ (which, according to Escott, is to country music
what the blues in B-flat is to jazz). Therefore, despite my earlier
statement regarding reproduction, I make no apologies for reprinting
Walsh’s words. In truth, he offers me a way forward for, like Robert
Johnson, I am at the crossroads. And there to meet me is the Person
form Porlock who, in the words of Mark Wallington was, “that
unfortunate figure in literary history held responsible for the
premature ending to Coleridge’s ‘Kubla Khan’. As the great poet sat
furiously scribbling down the epic he’d only just composed in an
anodyne-induced dream, the Person from Porlock arrived and detained
him in some trivial business matter. By the time Coleridge was
allowed to return to his pen and paper, the remaining two or three
hundred lines had escaped him”. Intriguingly, the eighth stanza of
Stevie Smith’s poem ‘Thoughts about the Person from Porlock’ (“I
long for the Person from Porlock, To bring my thoughts to an end, I
am becoming impatient to see him, I think of him as a friend”) may
well reflect her own struggle with intrusive thoughts, therefore
telling the reader more about the writer than the subject. A bit
like the article by Peter Higginson.
Anyway, back to Hank…
“Though crippled by back pain and alcohol, Williams accepted a gig
in Canton, Ohio, in the deep midwinter. Charles Carr, a student
seeking fees for the next semester, was employed to drive; but what
Carr didn’t know was that for some time Hank had been imbibing a
little bit of pseudopharmacy known as chloral hydrate, a powerful
sedative once famously used to put down an escaped leopard. Mixed
with alcohol it was likely to prove fatal, as Dante Gabriel Rossetti,
another tortured poet, had found out to his cost in 1882” (There is
a slightly different version. According to Curley Henson, the
overdose was that of a ‘sex stimulant called Ampheniamide, a drug
normally given to cattle for breeding purposes. Hank had received
this for what he thought was heroin from a dealer in Oklahoma’).
“The journey was awful; icy for the driver, back-pained for Hank.
They tried to stop and fly but the flights were full and the weather
too bad; so they stopped for some medicine, some morphine,” (a
possible explanation for the heroin theory) “which Hank threw into
his stomach along with the chloral hydrate. The last Carr saw of
him, he was sipping a beer in the back, utterly silent, washed out.
Carr, exhausted himself, nearly swerved off the road and hit a
policeman, and was arrested; but he refused to let the judge wake
Williams, taking the rap himself instead; and so the probability
arises that when, at seven the next morning, he did try and finally
wake Hank, he’d been dead some time, maybe all night, his soul gone,
his body alone and forsaken”. Not surprisingly, the authors cited at
the beginning of this also provide absorbing accounts of the life,
and death, of Hank Williams. Equally unsurprisingly, Bob Dylan has,
throughout his career, paid his own respects (most recently
contributing ‘I Can’t Get You Off Of My Mind’ to Timeless, and
performing ‘You Win Again’ during recent concerts).
Like the stillness in the wind ‘fore the
hurricane begins…
Porlock Hill, the steepest in England (a 1 in 4 incline), was first
ascended by motor vehicle in 1900. I assume the driver was English
and male as it was done for a bet. A year earlier, on the 12th of
January, a telegram was received at Lynmouth post office. The
Forrest Hall, a 1,900 ton ship with a crew of 13 men and 5
apprentices, was drifting ashore at Porlock Weir. Originally heading
from Bristol to Liverpool the ship had run into trouble in the
Bristol Channel and was therefore under tow. However, a strong
headwind resulted in a cable snapping. The crew’s response to the
rudder being torn off remains unrecorded. As do the thoughts of Jack
Crocombe, (coxswain of ‘Louisa’ the Lynmouth lifeboat), upon
discovering that severe weather prevented the Watchet station from
launching their own boat. EJ (Jim) Fisher takes up the story: “A
gale had been blowing all day and had already flooded several
houses. It was clear that the Louisa could not be launched at
Lynmouth. The coxswain proposed to take the boat by road to
Porlock’s sheltered harbour and launch it from there. This meant
using whatever horses and men could be obtained to haul the boat and
its carriage (which together weighed about 10 tons) the distance of
13 miles, including climbing up Countisbury Hill, reaching a height
of 1,423 feet above sea level, and taking it down Porlock Hill”. It
transpires that 100 men and 20 horses made the journey. However, six
of the men were sent ahead to widen the road (using pick axes and
shovels). By the time boat finally reached its destination a wheel
had fallen off, 80 of the men had given up, a garden wall and the
corner of a cottage had been dismantled, the road had been
impassable in several places, a sea wall had collapsed resulting in
a diversion, and the crew were required to fell a tree. According to
Fisher, “The crew were, of course, soaked hungry and exhausted, but
immediately launched the boat. It took an hour to reach the ship,
which had drifted dangerously close to Hurlestone Point. The
lifeboat was used to get a line from ship to tug, and some of the
lifeboat crew even went aboard the ship to raise the anchors as the
ship’s crew were too exhausted to do it”.
High water risin’ – risin’ night and day….
The flood referred to by Jim Fisher was of no consequence when
compared to the events of 1952. On the 16th of August, nine inches
of rain fell on Exmoor. The author S.H. Burton described what
followed: “The vast downpour that descended on the chains was
refused by the waterlogged, impervious land. Down every gully and
natural depression, down the channels dug by John Knight, down the
northwards running combes, the thousands of tons of water flowed
into the East and West Lyn rivers. Farley water and Hoaroak water
joined the already swollen East Lyn at Watersmeet. Half a dozen
streams converging at the headwaters of the West Lyn brought the
deluge from the western Chains, and at Barbrook Mill another influx
from Woolhanger Common joined the raging torrent, sweeping bridges
and houses away before starting the last deadly descent into
Lynmouth”.
Thirty-four people were killed by the three million gallons of water
that flowed from the Moors. Every single boat in the harbour was
washed out to sea and four main road bridges were swept away.
Intriguingly, there is a conspiracy theory that links the Ministry
of Defence directly to events. It was suggested that rain making
experiments, involving dropping dry ice into clouds, were being
undertaken. The object was to trigger a heavy storm, the plan being
to bog down enemy movements.
Crash on the levee, mama water’s gonna overflow
Johnny Cash observed, “there were of course forces against which we
are powerless – my song ‘Five Feet High and Rising’ came from my own
experience, not some storybook”. In 1935, the Cash family moved to
Dyess, an area of land fifteen miles to the west of the Mississippi
river. Eight years earlier the river broke through levees in more
than a hundred places and flooded more than 26,000 square miles of
land, forcing more than 600,000 people from their homes. In some
places the river was more than 80 miles wide, up to 500 people died
and countless animals drowned or starved. As a result Congress
passed the Flood Control Act (1928) allowing a series of ‘spillways’
to be incorporated in the existing levees. These were, in effect,
doorways which would open when the river was dangerously high. Any
floodwater would be diverted into nearby lakes, then onwards to the
Gulf of Mexico. In 1937, these measures were tested and for the most
part performed successfully. Which was just as well, for the
floodwaters were far stronger than those of ten years earlier.
Stephen Miller identifies the inspiration for Cash’s aforementioned
song: “Early in 1937, it started raining and didn’t stop, raining
heavily for the better part of a month. Water levels rose steadily
and the steps leading up to the Cash house became partly submerged.
Normal working life came to a standstill but of even greater concern
was the fact that the level of the Mississippi had risen by nearly
40 feet in places (15 feet above flood level). The extra ingredient
of strong winds made fears that the levees would break all the more
real. Water levels in the centre of Dyess were recorded at three
feet and rising. Back at the Cash household the waters were deeper
still: five feet high and rising”.
Heart of mine, be still…
Which of course, in the case of Charley Patton, is exactly what
happened. Following one of his trademark performances he had a heart
attack and died. According to HarpAmps.com. ‘High Water Everywhere’
(Part 1) “tells the story of the great Mississippi flood of 1927.
The two part song is long, covering both sides of a 78 rpm. The
music of part one is very similar to ‘Jinx Blues’ by Son House and
‘Future Blues’ by Willie Brown”. The truth is the reverse. Both
Brown and House were disciples of Patton and, in the case of Son
House, elements of Patton’s style were passed from generation to
generation by him (should you wish to complete the circle, a young
Robert Johnson understudied Son House when first learning to play
guitar). David Evans notes that “ Patton was enormously successful
on a regional basis from the early 1910s and more widely known once
he started recording commercially in 1929. His gruff voice and
percussive guitar playing – along with his image as an acrobatic
clown during performance – inspired countless bluesmen, who were
often equally impressed with his money, clothes, car, fancy guitars,
and many female admirers”. I can only assume that the latter may
have had something to do with the heart attack. Russell Beecher
states “Charley Patton was born in Edwards, Mississippi, sometime
around 1887. One story claims that he was an illegitimate member of
the Chatmon family which included fellow bluesmen Bo Carter and Sam
Chatmon. These formed the core unit of the legendary Mississippi
Sheiks who were the first to record ‘Sitting On Top Of The World’
and Bo on his own cut the original version of the perennial
‘Corinne, Corrina’. When you hear Patton’s gruff holler and the
ferocity of his guitar playing you’d imagine him to be physically
large and powerful but he was actually very short and slim with
traces of both Native American and African American in his
appearance. The colour of his skin and his rare ‘good’ or straight
hair lends more weight to the argument that he was, in fact, related
to the Chatmons”.
Two further points of interest: firstly, as well as clothes, cars,
fancy guitars, and women, Patton had a fondness for cocaine which,
in combination with at least one of the aforementioned, probably
didn’t do much for his heart either. And secondly, Patton recorded a
song called ‘Pony Blues’, which, notwithstanding a lengthy trip
round the Delta, brings me back to Porlock Hill via the Equine
contribution to events on the night of the 12th of January, 1899.
I was driven up it 67 years later and although I have only the
vaguest of mental pictures, I remember the journey with affection
(as a young child I was taken on more than one holiday (I think) to
Devon (a conversation with dad conforms this and his recollections
will appear shortly). But before introducing he who knows everything
and nothing in equal measure, I draw your attention to the following
observation. It’s been four weeks since I wrote the introduction to
this and the intervening period has been spent presenting a model of
Dual Diagnosis service provision to various Community Mental Health
Teams. At times I have felt like Michael Fish addressing Bob Dylan –
I know something is happening, I just don’t know what it is, whilst
he knows that, for a weatherman, tomorrow is a long time. The fact
that Simon (the other member of the team) and myself aren’t going to
have a designated caseload hasn’t helped. At the time of writing
there are at least 17 Mental Health related teams throughout the
county. Statistics suggest that between 30% and 70% of their clients
present with a Dual Diagnosis. Each team has, on average, anywhere
between 10 to 15 practitioners; each practitioner has an average
caseload of 25. Even without working out the precise figures, the
reality is that Simon and myself would be unable to function
(originally I was going to suggest that we would be ‘swamped’ but
it seemed somehow insensitive, particularly in relation to the
content of the article so far. Bizarrely, during the editing process
I came across the following, published in 1996, and felt that it
merited inclusion: “On a coast precariously short of natural
harbours, Boscastle is the first place of shelter south of Hartland
Point and it must have been sighted with great relief during the
days of sail. Having said that, trying to navigate a sailboat into
the harbour looks like the nautical equivalent of the Canal Turn at
Aintree. The currents are evil and the rocky flanks at the harbour
entrance form an unforgiving chicane. If the Atlantic doesn’t get
you, chances are Boscastle Harbour will. But, the entrance
negotiated, a natural haven presents itself: a deep, protective
gorge, and a sheltered village through which the River Valency
idles”).
And so to the abridged thoughts of a passing sage (edited because,
following what I now acknowledge as a misleading brief, Dad’s
initial thoughts were not what I had hoped for. We talked and he
agreed to my request for amendments. Ultimately, I needed his heart
not his head. Fortuitously, he provided me with enough of each,
allowing me to give you a glimpse of the man behind the mask).
“Porlock is heartily to be commended for the nurturing of a person
so public – spirited as to postpone the completion of Kubla Khan.
Gallant as was his conduct, however, one feels obliged to reflect
that with a little dash, a fast lugger and a millstone the piece’s
publication could have been forever prevented. And one must in all
fairness condemn outright Porlock for its hill. I once, in pursuit
of Henry Williamson, conducted your regular and apparently esteemed
correspondent up said landmark. He was but three. ‘A Chronicle Of
Ancient Sunlight’ was, I explained, a passionate if self – indulgent
condemnation of the Great War and its consequences which, taken
together, had resulted in Williamson’s conversion to fascism, a
movement which he considered would end all wars. Williamson was once
my hero. He had written two wonderful books, ‘Tarka The Otter’ and
‘Salar The Salmon’. When I became aware of his fascism I at once
made my way to Porlock to his North Devon home in order to confront
him with his error. I was too late. Unlike fascism, he had died”.
Intriguingly, whilst talking with Dad I remembered that his father
had embarked on a similar journey, attending a pro – Mosley meeting
in order to assault Blackshirts.
Although there is an element of artistic licence contained within
his recollections, my childhood did contain such moments. Everything
was explained, often at length. I learned, amongst many other
things, tolerance (but admit to forgetting everything when trying to
understand Rosie). I could, had I have chosen to, become a very good
fisherman. Instead, I lived my own life. And here I am, hopelessly
marooned somewhere in the country of country, where as Nicholas
Dawidoff suggests, “the music affects me the same way great books
do, informing my own experiences even as they give me a sense of
being transported to new places, set down among people who might be
said to have nothing to do with my own existence”. And the more I
listen to the Louvin Brothers, Roy Acuff, Hank Snow, Bill Monroe,
Johnny Cash, Hank Williams, and a host of others, the more I come to
understand Bob Dylan. Which, as you can well imagine, is fine and
dandy by me.

|