|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
1101 words on Isis, the moon and Molly Bloom by
Patrick J. Webster
|
|||||
|
To continue: in the penultimate verse of the song the narrator and Isis have a short, surreal conversation in which the narrator, somewhat unconvincingly it must be said, agrees he will stay and seal his commitment to Isis:
The narrator’s final quoted word in the performed version of the lyric is a life-affirming, Joycean: ‘yes,’ which offers the song a further intertextual resonance. The narrator of the song, like Leopold Bloom, has returned to his beginning, and, after a period of wandering, has found no answer, no solution, no meaning with which to confront the sense of futility, frustration and loneliness he had had before he left. Furthermore, Isis, like Molly Bloom, has remained at home waiting for the man to return, as she knew he would. Both Dylan’s unnamed narrator and Leopold Bloom are, in a sense, subjugated by the women they are involved with. There is a sense that both Isis and Molly Bloom have a greater understanding to men’s fears and desires and that, as women, they know how to use this power. Isis’s lover and Bloom may possess the universal male signifier, they may travel in the world as women cannot, but for all of this they ultimately seem dependent on the female presence and are continually drawn back to them. The tomb was empty, the journey made by the narrator could thus be seen as an allegorical account of a search which ultimately leads only to the place where the journey had begun. John Herdman has commented that the narrator of ‘Isis’ has ...
Dylan’s hero has found no solution, no meaning, and his only option would seem to be to return and to attempt to find some meaning in life via woman’s love. This, I would argue, is the underlying contradiction of the construct of masculinity in this text and also elsewhere in Dylan’s work. Aidan Day, one of the few critics of Dylan to have discussed the implications of masculinity within the song in any detail, notes that the narrator’s return ‘with the sun in his eyes’ plays upon the association of Isis with the moon:
Thus the song could be read as an allegorical construct encircling the impossibility of ever reconciling gender differences, the impossibility of man and woman ever fully comprehending one another. The question the song appears to ask is whether Isis, and her reckless, masculine lover, can ever live happily ever after, or indeed, can any man and woman ever truly live happily ever after? The song derives from an album called Desire, and there would seem to be a desire to achieve a union between the masculine and feminine universes. But whether this can ever be achieved within the performative construct of gender in this song, and many others in Dylan’s canon, remains uncertain. In the thirteenth and final verse we get this summing up:
The narrator, forced back into a feminine domain, recalls the contradiction of needing Isis and not needing her, and of risking his life and possibly his sanity in the process of doing this. Thus the song ends, in a completely circular fashion, on the fifth day of May in the drizzling rain. To be continued
Patrick J. Webster
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|